Nuclear Proliferation and Escalation Risk
Arms control has collapsed while nuclear arsenals modernise, creating the highest escalation risk in decades.
Severity score
38.8
Serious · default weighting
Trajectory
Worsening
What this is
Nine states hold roughly 12,000 nuclear warheads. Nearly every major arms control treaty has lapsed or been suspended, arsenals are being modernised and in some cases expanded, and nuclear rhetoric has re-entered active conflicts. The expected death toll today is zero, but the tail risk is uniquely catastrophic: a regional exchange is modelled to cause tens of millions of immediate deaths and a global famine killing billions through soot-driven cooling. It is included here as the clearest example of an event where present impact and potential impact diverge enormously.
Score breakdown
Loss of life
5Direct and attributable mortality, normalised across annual and cumulative tolls.
Lives negatively impacted
70People displaced, injured, food-insecure, exposed or otherwise materially harmed.
Financial cost
10Direct damage, lost output and health-system spend attributable to the event.
Environmental impact
60Emissions, habitat and biodiversity loss, contamination and irreversibility.
Trajectory
88Whether the situation is escalating, and how much worse it is plausibly getting.