GlobalConflictSince 1945Curatedmedium confidence

Nuclear Proliferation and Escalation Risk

Arms control has collapsed while nuclear arsenals modernise, creating the highest escalation risk in decades.

Severity score

38.8

Serious · default weighting

Trajectory

Worsening

What this is

Nine states hold roughly 12,000 nuclear warheads. Nearly every major arms control treaty has lapsed or been suspended, arsenals are being modernised and in some cases expanded, and nuclear rhetoric has re-entered active conflicts. The expected death toll today is zero, but the tail risk is uniquely catastrophic: a regional exchange is modelled to cause tens of millions of immediate deaths and a global famine killing billions through soot-driven cooling. It is included here as the clearest example of an event where present impact and potential impact diverge enormously.

Score breakdown

Loss of life

5

Direct and attributable mortality, normalised across annual and cumulative tolls.

Lives negatively impacted

70

People displaced, injured, food-insecure, exposed or otherwise materially harmed.

Financial cost

10

Direct damage, lost output and health-system spend attributable to the event.

Environmental impact

60

Emissions, habitat and biodiversity loss, contamination and irreversibility.

Trajectory

88

Whether the situation is escalating, and how much worse it is plausibly getting.